Every FTSO data provider, side by side

How to read this table

Primary / Secondary

anchor-feed band hit rates this epoch — the accuracy that earns rewards. The rule under each Primary figure is that figure on a fixed 0–100% scale

Over-deleg

share of vote power above the 2.5% network cap, which earns nothing extra — amber above 0%, red above 20%

Rate CV

reward-rate variation across snapshotted epochs — lower is steadier

APR

delegator-net annualised rate from last epoch, after the provider's fee

Passes / Strikes

FIP.10 minimal-condition record for the epoch — any strike is flagged amber

Cond.

conditions met: S scaling · F fast updates · St staking · D data connector

Node uptime

the lowest uptime among this provider's validator nodes, not the average — one bad validator is an outage whatever its siblings are doing. Red under 95%. An em-dash means the registry lists no nodes, which is not a fault: running validators is separate from providing price feeds

Nodes down

validator nodes the registry could not reach. It is a separate column because an unreachable node reports no uptime rather than 0% — so a provider with half its nodes down can still show 99.9% in the column beside it

Red figures

a 0.00% band rate (registered, but nothing landed in the band), or availability under 95% — flagged, not printed as an ordinary number

The hairline

the tick across each Primary rule is the field median, 36.18% — a bar reaching past it beats half the field

The gold row

Seraphim FTSO, marked where the sort puts it and never moved to the top — the register stays an honest sort of the whole field