Seraphim Lab LiveDelegate
Seraphim LabSeraphim FTSO · Flare mainnet

Delegation is a judgement about accuracy.

Every 90-second voting round, Flare asks its data providers for a price and rewards the ones whose submission lands inside the network's consensus band. Delegated FLR earns from the provider it backs — so a provider that misses the band costs its delegators the same rounds it costs itself.

Seraphim FTSO is engineered to sit inside that band every round, and publishes the whole field's record — ours included, sorted wherever the data puts it — so the judgement can be made on evidence rather than on a promise.

Both are non-custodial and both now happen on this site, signed in your own wallet — no portal, no copying node IDs. Delegated FLR stays liquid and can be redirected at any reward epoch; a stake locks on the P-chain for a term you choose and counts 5× per FLR toward vote power since FIP.16.

Delegating, in three steps

  1. Wrap FLR to WFLR — same value, same wallet, now able to vote.
  2. Point your delegation at Seraphim FTSO, up to 100% of your WFLR.
  3. Claim each epoch. Redirect or undelegate whenever you like.
Walk through it →
Provider entities tracked
188
Participating this epoch
99
Reward epoch
#434
Price feeds monitored
62

Seraphim vs the field

Net of fee · 124 providers compared

Delegation APR, after the provider's fee
Seraphim FTSO
2.51%
Field median
2.26%

+0.25 ppof APR above the median provider this epoch

Both bars share one fixed scale — zero to 2.83%, the best net rate in the same rated field — and each prints its own figure; the vertical rule marks the field median, drawn across our own bar.

Our position, net of fee

#11of 124 rated providers

#1 · best net rate10 ahead of us · 113 behind us#124

10 providers currently pay their delegators more than we do, and 113 pay less. We publish them all, ranked, on the same page as ourselves — a comparison that can only flatter us is not evidence.

Gross reward-rate rank
#9 of 124 rated
Less our provider fee
20%
Rank a delegator is paid on
#11 of 124 rated

What this comparesEvery provider that published a reward rate for epoch #434 — 124 of the 188 provider entities we track — ranked on the rate a delegator actually receives: gross rate less that provider's own fee. Both ranks above are counted in that same rated field, which is why the fee moves the figure and not the denominator. APR annualises the per-epoch rate over the ≈104 reward epochs in a year. Read from the same 15-minute network snapshot as the record above — data as of 2026-09-18T08:45:43Z; /pulse and /providers compute it live and can read a hair different between snapshots. Check every row →

Why accuracy decides what you earn

Three claims, each checkable

01

Accuracy — the band, not the guess

Each round the protocol collects every provider's submitted price and forms a consensus band around the weighted median. Submissions inside the band earn the round's accuracy rewards; submissions outside it earn nothing for that round, and missed rounds are never recovered later. We rank #9 of 124 providers with a published delegation reward rate this epoch — the compounded result of that primary band hit rate. See the live per-round bands →

02

Transparency — this site is the evidence

We publish every provider's record — reward rate, fee, availability, primary band hit rate — refreshed each epoch. Our own row is marked in place and never re-ordered, so it sorts below the providers who are beating us whenever that is what the data says. Sort the register yourself →

03

Fee — 20% of delegator rewards

A provider's fee is the share it keeps of the accuracy rewards its delegators earn; the rest is distributed to delegated vote power. Every APR on this page is already net of ours, so the figure you compare is the figure you receive. Work it through on the calculator →

Seraphim FTSOtight to the medianREWARDED BANDCONSENSUS MEDIANUNREWARDED — TOO HIGHUNREWARDED — TOO LOW
Seraphim FTSOtight to the median, every roundREWARDED BANDCONSENSUS MEDIANUNREWARDEDUNREWARDED
FigureSchematic, not live data: how one voting round is scored. Providers submit a price; the protocol forms a band around the weighted median; only submissions inside the band are paid. Live per-round bands, with our actual submission overlaid, are on the feed pages.

Staking is the second way that accuracy pays you

Mirror reward stream · 92 providers earning one

What the staking stream is

Delegating WFLR is one stream. Staking is the other: you stake FLR on Flare's P-chain to a provider's validator nodes, that stake is mirrored into the provider's vote power, and it is paid out of the same round-by-round accuracy the delegation stream is paid from. FIP.16 raised the weight of the staking stream, so it now accounts for more of what an FLR holder earns than it used to.

It is a different action from delegation — a different chain and a different transaction — and it now happens on this site. Connect a wallet on the stake page, pick one of our validator nodes from the live uptime panel, and sign each step as your own wallet presents it: two to four signatures, the C→P transfer handled for you, the protocol minimums read from the chain as you type, and the reward claim on the same page. No portal, no copying node IDs — though the Flare Portal path is still documented there for readers without a browser wallet. Stake FLR to our nodes →

Delegation

What you hold
WFLR, in your own wallet
Where it happens
Flare's C-chain, from this site
Liquidity
Redirect or unwrap at any epoch

Staking

What you hold
FLR staked to our validator nodes
Where it happens
Flare's P-chain, via the Portal
Liquidity
Locked for the term you choose

The two streams are independent: you can do either, both, or neither, and neither one is a precondition for the other.

Staking reward rate — our rank

#23of 92 providers earning a staking reward

#1 · best staking rate22 ahead of us · 69 behind us#92

One of the highest staking reward rates on Flare, on the only measure that settles it: 22 providers currently pay their stakers more than we do, and 69 pay less. Rates move every epoch — the register is where to re-check it.

Seraphim FTSO · net of fee
10.81%
Field median
9.60%

Staking APR, annualised from the per-epoch mirror rate. Both bars share one fixed scale — zero to 21.10%, the best staking rate in the same field — and each prints its own figure; the vertical rule marks the field median, drawn across our own bar.

What this comparesEvery provider that earned a staking reward in epoch #434 — 92 of the 188 provider entities we track — ranked on reward_rate_total_mirror: the mirror reward per unit of stake plus the uniform base reward every staker also receives, the same basis aggregators such as FlareMetrics quote. The explorer publishes it after the provider's fee has been taken out of the pool, so it is already the staker's own share and no second deduction is applied. APR annualises the per-epoch rate over the ≈104 reward epochs in a year. Read from the same 15-minute network snapshot as the record above — data as of 2026-09-18T08:45:43Z. Check every row →

Delegate to Seraphim FTSO

Wrap FLR to WFLR and point your delegation at Seraphim FTSO — ranked #9 of 124 providers with a published delegation reward rate this epoch, at a 20% fee. Your FLR never leaves your wallet, and you can redirect it at any reward epoch.

From the lab

Research & tooling

Live analytics

Seraphim Pulse

Network-wide provider accuracy, reward rates, eligibility and per-feed consensus bands, refreshed every epoch.

Education

The Learn hub

From "what is an oracle?" to the exact weighted-quartile math behind FTSO rewards — layered so you go as deep as you want.

Methodology

How rewards are actually computed

IQR and PCT bands, the 2.5% delegation cap, FIP.10 eligibility and FIP.16 burn — written out in full, because our own numbers are scored by them.

Forward-looking

Confidential computing readiness

Flare Confidential Computing brings hardware-secured TEEs to the protocol. We explain it, and document how an oracle operator prepares for it.

The operator

Seraphim Lab operates Seraphim FTSO on Flare mainnet: a multi-source pricing engine serving anchor and block-latency feeds, FDC attestations and staking validators.

Anchor + block-latency feedsFDC attestationsStaking validators

On-chain identity

0xCD1eADB3Ea02B3500e9d3425f3fB08AAb8F33378

Contact

@SeraphimFTSO · @seraphim_Lab
info@seraphimlab.ca