Seraphim The state of the oracle, live
Where the protocol clock stands, who carries the most delegated vote power, and how accurate they are — read from the Flare Systems Explorer and refreshed every voting round. Our own provider is measured by the same columns as everyone else.
#1458803round 563 of 3,360 in this epoch
One round every 90s. Each round asks every provider for a price on every anchor feed and pays only the submissions that land inside the consensus band.
#435in 2d 21h 55m
Expected to open 2026-09-21 07:00 UTC. A delegation you change now takes effect from that epoch.
A reward epoch is the protocol's accounting period — 3.5 days of 90-second voting rounds. Accuracy rewards accrue inside it and are claimed against it, so every figure on this page is scoped to epoch #434 unless it says otherwise.
The 8 largest providers by vote power
99 participating · sorted by vote power
How to read this table
- Over-deleg
- share of vote power above the 2.5% network cap, which earns nothing extra — the largest providers are usually the most over-delegated
- Primary band
- anchor-feed hit rate this epoch — the accuracy that earns rewards. The rule under each figure is that figure on a fixed 0–100% scale; the ink tick on it is the field median, 41.18% across all 99 participating providers
- Availability
- share of rounds submitted and revealed; under 95% is flagged, and a provider registered with no band hits at all is marked in words
- Est. APR
- delegator-net annualised rate from the last epoch, after the provider's fee
Swipe the table sideways for all 7 columns →
| Provider | Vote power | Over-deleg | Primary band | Availability | Fee | Est. APR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Flare.Space | 2.91B | 63.4% | 54.10% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.26% |
 Bifrost Wallet | 1.50B | 29.2% | 36.35% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.25% |
 Atlas TSO | 962.71M | 0.0% | 46.69% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.44% |
 FlareFi | 885.21M | 0.0% | 73.72% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.26% |
 AlphaOracle | 867.53M | 0.0% | 65.84% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.26% |
 A-FTSO | 793.94M | 0.0% | 50.57% | 98.67% | 20% | 2.55% |
 NORTSO | 778.12M | 0.0% | 63.13% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.34% |
 Flare Oracle | 753.84M | 0.0% | 79.07% | 100.00% | 20% | 2.26% |
Rows are the top 8 of 99 by vote power until you sort a column. Vote power buys weight in the consensus, not accuracy — the two columns are independent, and the register sorts every provider on either. Full table with accuracy, eligibility and stability →
#92of 99 by vote power
Scale, not accuracy — which is why the table above is sorted by vote power and we are not in it. Accuracy is the figure above, where our own rule stands in the same distribution as everyone else's; the full row is on the register.
Market and funding context
Epoch #435 offers
- FLR / USD
- —
- FTSO feeds funded
- 62
- FDC offers
- 8.92M FLR
Feed and attestation funding is offered per reward epoch and sets what accuracy is worth: 62 anchor feeds carry rewards into epoch #435. FLR/USD is quoted from Routescan for scale only — rewards are paid in FLR.
Convinced by the data? Delegating takes two minutes. Delegate to Seraphim →